Monday, November 1, 2010

Paranormal Activity 2 (2010): An Un-Necessary Evil




Last year's
Paranormal Activity took the world by storm, using some creative marketing tactics on an old concept - the first person/found footage angle. The Hollywood formula is film + blockbuster gross = automatic sequel, so after being a box office juggernaut, an expedited sequel was not a surprise in the least. Unfortunately in this case, the powers that be in Hollywood should have just left well enough alone.

The second installment is more prequel than sequel with events taking place 60 days before Micah's murder at the end of
Paranormal Activity. This time around, demonic forces target Katie's (Katie Featherston) sister Kristi Rey (Sprague Grayden) and Kristi's family which includes husband Dan (Brian Boland), stepdaughter Ali (Molly Ephraim) and newborn baby Hunter (William Juan Prieto and Jackson Xenia Prieto).

In an attempt to not reveal any major spoilers, the demon from the original terrorizes the Rey family with the same shenanigans, like door slamming and pot banging, that afflicted Katie and Micah in the first one. There might be some tweaks to the household appliances used to inject some of the film's scares, if you want to call them that, but at the end of the day it is all just a rehash that personifies the "bad horror sequel" stereotype.



There are some scenes that attempt to develop a little more backstory to the demonic forces that plague the two sisters since their childhood, while other incidents attempt to tie the original and sequel together. The problem is that these ideas deliver a sensation of being forced. Trying to invent some elements in order to continue a story for an originally unplanned sequel is one thing, but it is a known fact that this sequel is a complete afterthought, created with sole purpose of riding the Paranormal cash cow until it dries out. Therefore the attempted cleverness of trying to align these two films feels rightfully unnatural.

The original's slow pace was acceptable because it was all a setup for a fantastic set of effective payoffs in the late second and entire third acts. Meanwhile the sequel's pacing is even slower, less suspenseful and delivers a climax that is both rushed and absurd. It's too bad because the acting is quite good, especially with Featherston's reprisal of the Katie character and majority of the scare scenes carried by the young Eprhaim. Acting is definitely is not accountable for the overall disappointment that this film leaves you with as you exit the theater. And this disappointment stems from the fact that the original was eerie enough to get under my skin, but this follow-up is simply not scary. There might have been one effective, legitimate jump scene that was played for comedy unfortunately and wasted in the process.


Sure their wallets got a lot thicker after the record-breaking opening last weekend, but after the final product delivered in
Paranormal Activity 2, I am sure a majority of the same moviegoers will be more cautious when an inevitable third installment comes around next year. Recommended for extreme fans of the original or those who want to see Katie's cleavage, which you do get to see a lot of this time around.


I was just kidding Katie. You know I love you.

But in all seriousness, don't go out of your way to see this in the theater and wait for DVD/Blu-ray - which by the way will contain a "shocking" alternate ending that will be available when it is released for home systems. Looks like they are already trying to cover up bad press with promises of meaningful deleted scenes and alternate endings. If these are going to be so good, maybe they should have been put in the theatrical release and not used by a safety net after the film's weaknesses are exposed.

13 comments:

TS Hendrik said...

Yeah... I don't need a third one. The first was good enough. I wonder how many they'll be able to pump out before it stops being profitable.

Carl Manes said...

Had to skip the review for now, my brain is still untainted since I still wanna see this one!

Planet of Terror said...

Spot on Geof, we share some of the same sentiments.

And I just could not get past the GLARING continuity gaps. Check out my review. Good discussion going on over at PoT.

Geof said...

TS - it's officially a cash cow at this point. No real thought went into it and it shows. Pass on it by all accounts.

Carl - I hear ya. I don't like reading reviews on new releases until I can see them myself. Please stop back though because I'd love to hear your thoughts.

PoT - I figure we would agree. When Katie in a bikini in a pool is a film's highlight, that's trouble, and not because of Katie. I love her. I haven't checked out your review or discussion yet but I will now.

Jennifer Scavone said...

If they are going to make another one, they shoudl at least put some new scare tactics in there besides the same old dragging someone across the floor, etc. BORING.

B-Movie Becky said...

Agree 100% with your review. Repeated scares = boring. The pacing was terrible for a sequel, since we've seen it all before. And yes, the acting was good, probably better this time around, so it was wasted potential.

Very disappointed in this one.

Dom said...

I'm with both you and Cortez on this one. After seeing it, I'm actually kind of shocked at how many positive reviews were out there.

One thing that really bugged me is why was there such resistance in reviewing any of the footage? (something that was not an issue in the first, as the couple were reviewing the footage on a daily basis). I mean, if you go to all the trouble to install these security cameras throughout your house (which must have cost a pretty penny) why be so reluctant to review them when strange things are clearly afoot?

Dunno, that in particular bugged the shit out of me.

Hart Johnson said...

Not surprised. Then... the first one bored me. a lot. I think I may have developed ADHD, but I can't really take a movie that takes that long for anything to happen. I'm too old and have too little of life left to sit through it.

anna said...

Like Paranormal Activity? Check out trailer for 'The Possession of David O'Reilly'. Whaddya think? http://on.fb.me/dz78WU

ISRAEL CARRASCO said...

Thanx for the review. Because of you, I will wait for the movies release.

Geof said...

Jennifer - you hit the nail on the head...boring. A boring rehash.

Becky - Knowing how big of a fan you were of the original, I was especially interested in seeing what your thoughts were on the sequel and glad to see we are on the same page. Wasted potential...exactly.

Dom - I wished I saw this before we met up because I would have gone off all night about how I hate films that insult my intelligence and steal my cash. Lazy thought put into this "manufacturing line" mess.

Hart - I really enjoyed the first one because the payoff was there and although slow at some times, cool elements were introduced in scenes along the way. Can I ask you if I can please borrow the last line in your comment. I love that!

anna - you just reminded me I have not done a SPAM MAIL FAIL in a long time.

Israel - At this point, it's pretty much not worth seeing unless you are a big fan of the series.

Jamie Gibbs (Mithril Wisdom) said...

I was really hoping that the original Paranormal Activity would scare the bajesus outta me, but alas, it was not so. I still enjoyed it, and a few scenes made me a little uncomfortable watching in the dark at 2am (prime scaretime, I reckon). I've only seen the trailer for this which, while it does seem to include some scares, screams 'SEQUEL'. I'll wait for this on DVD, and maybe even then I'll wait for the bargain bin. Thanks for the review :)

Geof said...

Jamie - If you didn't enjoy the first one or it didn't really give you any scares...STAY AWAY. You will be cursing your decision to waste your time and money at about the 35-40 minute mark.

Post a Comment