Sunday, November 8, 2009

KiR Edition: Trick 'r Treat (2009) Review (minor spoilers)



"Uncle SAM wants You!"



This edition of Keeping It Reel (KiR) focuses on the highly anticipated
Trick 'r Treat released in 2009, even though it was finished then shelved back in 2007...

I have read some spoiler-free reviews in both blogs and message board alike that consistently seemed to slam this film. Words like "overrated" and "overhyped" or even phrases like "now we see why this film was shelved for two years and released straight to DVD" were thrown out to describe this product. So I have to admit that when I sat down to watch Trick 'r Treat a few nights ago, I was expecting to be severely disappointed after having sky high expectations.

Film is a subjective medium, but I have to disagree the negative descriptions I read. I thought this movie was fun as hell! Maybe because I have a soft spot for horror anthologies? I mean I sat through The Burning Moon and Chillers before, so you can see how extreme my infatuation for horror anthologies are if I sat through those two in their entirety (even though Moon had its moments). But it was way more than that. This film was a slick horror film and delivered something I was totally not expecting.




The alternate ending to Ferris Bueller's Day Off


T'rT
is broken down into four stories that somewhat overlap each other Pulp Fiction-style:

1) A mild-mannered prinicpal (Dylan Baker) spends his Halloween night delivering a harsher discipline on students outside the classroom walls.

2) In somewhat of an ode to Little Red Riding Hood, a young woman (Anna Paquin) attempts to shred her virginity while staving off a predator on the way to her sister's party.

3) A group of children use an old urban legend to prank a nerdy girl, until things turn for the worse.

4) An old hermit (Brian Cox) battles an unearthly creature in a mano y monster slugfest, literally.

1-4a) A wraparound story with a mysterious little fellow named Sam that links the segments together either directly or through the film's main theme: "Follow the rules of Halloween or face the consequences!"


The first story is somewhat humorous considering the carnage taking place against children, but the entertainment is exemplified due to Baker, who always plays such a great creep. Ever since his role in Happiness, he nails the "creepy man" performances every time. This segment's length is just long enough not to get annoying which is a good thing.














Bet you he wishes he was back in Bad Santa


Paquin's story seems too be completely predictable at first, but a nice spin keeps it fresh. Even though you are waiting for a twist of some kind to rear its ugly head, you might not be expecting something along the lines of what happens. Don't want to seem as if I am giving this segment any major accolades in the originality department because this is the least interesting or satisfying of all the segments.

On the other end of the spectrum, the urban legend story is the creepiest of them all by far. The flashback story of the deranged children is a great setup while the story ends quite disturbingly in the film's present-day. Brooding atmosphere, unnerving sound effects and excellent cinematography make this segment easily the best of the bunch.

"Brian Cox versus Sam" is quite a fun little romp that ends with a nice twist and brings the whole film full circle. Too bad you can see the twist coming a mile away, but it still is a satisfying one. Cox always bring his A-game to the table and his performance in this film is no exception.




Cox is always a good time......that's what she said - "Oh!"


The non-linear narrative is a nice approach to the genre, but is also used very effectively in the horror anthology realm. This film is not Creepshow but it is pretty damn close. At the same time it is nowhere near the bottom of the horror anthology niche either.

I think a major reason why some people might have been turned off by T'rT, besides over 2 years of serious hype, include the fact that is simply is not scary and anyone who has watched a good deal of horror films will be able to accurately predict the twists and turns. Yes it's gory and brutal especially when it comes to how children are treated in this film, but it simply is not "Aaah!" scary. And I don't think that is what the creators intended either. Another reason for some horror enthusiasts' displeasure might be in the fact that anyone who has watched a good deal of horror films will be able to accurately predict the twists and turns. Then again, this is not supposed to be a film like The Sixth Sense, so the twists are not geared to be the main strength.

Besides the aforementioned acting, sound effect and script, another aspect that makes T'rT so great is the fact that the tone of the film feels so different then any other horror film. Sure the source material is borrowed and it does try to emulate Creepshow, but the creators did their best to give the film its own lore and deliver a real "Halloween" holiday film. Watching it the other day made me feel like I time traveled back to last month. I could watch this next June and feel in the Halloween holiday spirit.




Sookie Red Riding Hood


So why was this film shelved for so long? There are theories that include: the studios fear of going up against SAW IV and the company was worried that the team who bombed with Superman Returns in 2006 (producer Bryan Singer and first-time director Michael Dougherty) would lay an egg with this attempt as well. I don't believe either of these theories because October is a big enough month to release a horror film and make a lot of money before running into competition from a SAW sequel. Secondly, it seems ludicrous that a company would shelf a film for fear of failure from a man whose pass-to-fail ratio is heavily weighed in his favor and I'm talking about Singer here (Superman Returns vs. The Usual Suspects, X-Men, X-Men 2, Apt Pupil, etc.) I believe that WB feared the backlash of marketing the hell out of a film that broke the convention in terms of violence against children then releasing it nationwide in the big screen. Just my two cents. This film was too good to be delayed for so long and then be sentenced to a straight-to-video fate.

At the end of the day, we should all be happy that it finally got released and during the greatest holiday of the year. I highly, highly recommend this film and encourage those who have not seen it to do so. Just don't look to be scared out of your wits watching this one and be prepared for something a little different. And please don't let the Riding Hood segment bring down the overall product.

5 comments:

Carl (ILHM) said...

I am going to end up being the last person on Earth to see this one, since I refuse to buy anything for more than $6 lol.. Very happy to read another positive review my friend, cant wait to see it and put it in regular Halloween rotation!

Bob Ignizio said...

I'm almost entirely in agreement with you. The Paquin segment was my least favorite as well, but the way the movie is put together the whole adds up to more than just the sum of its parts. And you're also right in saying it's not especially scary, but it does a great job of creating an atmosphere of the macabre that has just the right amount of fun in it. It's a great Halloween movie, and it really did deserve a wider release, especially considering some of the horror movies that do get major releases.

real estate agent in Vancouver BC said...

I haven't seen it yet but I think that Michael Dougherty has enough talent to make a good movie. Actually I planned to see some new horror movie during Halloween and Trick 'r Treat would have been a nice choice. May be it will be my choice for next Halloween. But finally this year I remained loyal to classics like Nosferatu. The rest of our family watched also The Exorcist.

Regards,
Jay

Chris O. said...

I actually did a post on this flick a while back. Like you, I had heard the all the hype, but I actually really enjoyed the film. I thought it was fun and even occasionally surprising (the Paquin revelation comes to mind). It also reminded me a lot of the classic Creepshow series. I think it deserved a lot better than to be unceremoniously dumped direct to video 2 years after it was finished.

Geof said...

Carl - I honestly thought I was the last one on Earth to see it. Everyone's blogs already had reviews a week old by the time I got around to watching this. It was good though. And on a side note, I saw a pic of you trick-or-treating on your blog and you do kinda look like that Tigger-Spiderman guy. Funny stuff! =)

Bob - Thanks. I am glad we agree. This really is a great film for the season.

real estate agent - thanks for stopping by the Man-Cave! I appreciate the comment.

Chris - I will go check out your review. Glad to see some love for this flick after reading so many harsh slams against it.

Post a Comment